[8] He took Agag king of the Amalekites alive, and all his people he totally destroyed with the sword. 13:29; 21:13, 434; Deut 1:44). 15:15 ASV). Each rebelled against God and refused to repent out of pride. Save 15% on BibleGateway+ with code SPRINGSTUDY15. 23 And not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies. (Romans 8:2223 ESV). They were among the nomadic raiders defeated by Gideon and were condemned to annihilation by Samuel. Whereas the Kenites passed into permanent settlement during the First Temple period and were assimilated in Judah (I Chron. The Amalekites are not simply threatening a people group with their determination to wipe out Israel, but they are a threat to the salvation plan of God for all other nations. If it helps, 1 Samuel 15:8-9, Saul did spared the king of Amalekites, Agag. [24][25] It is, however, possible that the name Amalek may have been given to two different nations. How come David fought an Amalekite army that Saul had allegedly eradicated a few years earlier? [29], According to a midrash, Amalek's mother Timna was a princess who had tried to convert to Judaism but had been rejected by Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Judg 12:15 and remarks earlier). Amalek is described as the "chief of Amalek" among the "chiefs of the sons of Esau," from which it is assumed that he ruled a clan or territory named after him . This is perhaps the most widely ignored command in the Bible. BEST VALUE in digital Bible study. God saved the Jews in Persia, however, and Haman, his sons, and the rest of Israels enemies were destroyed instead (Esther 9:510). 24:20), had no wish to fight alone against Israel but rather, with the help of many nations (Mekhilta, ed. Saul was severely rebuked for this incomplete job and his attempt at "spin" by suggesting that all had been eliminated when, clearly, they had not. Their final defeat occurred in the time of Hezekiah. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. Etymology [ edit] In some rabbinical interpretations, Amalek is etymologised as am lak, 'a people who lick (blood)', [2] but most specialists regard the origin to be unknown. identifies Amalek with Rome (Bacher, Tann, 1 (19302), 146). Their first encounter with Israel was when they attacked the rear of Israel but were defeated by Joshua at Rephidim (Ex 17:8-13, Deut 25:17, 18). Jesus compares the final judgment to the work of a shepherd who separates the sheep from the goats. It is a reminder that wickedness is a cancer that must be removed before the renewal and restoration of all things. ; Josh. Those among the Amalekites who lived in the border regions maintained a relationship to the Kenites, who certainly lived near the permanent settlements (I Sam. Here we have an example of not the extermination of the Northern Ten Tribes but exiling them and replacing them with other people groups. Assuming that everyone who died in the city of Amalek equates to the entire Amalek nation being exitinct is like assuming you've met every single American that exists upon visiting New York. They were the first nation to attack the Jewish people after the Exodus from Egypt, and they are seen as the archetypal enemy of the Jews. They were a warlike people. It is sad that they did not take advantage of their time of grace. That Amaleks unrelenting and destructive spirit and action against God and the cause of His people Israel was heinous to the Lord is seen later in the reminder to Saul concerning these wilderness incidents and in Gods command that the king is to destroy these God-defying Amalekites (1 Sam 15:2, 3; cf.
how old is bill from big city greens
...expert with passion